Friday, August 24, 2007

How Does One Value A Stock Market Index?

Stock market indices are calculated from the quotes of the stocks of which they are composed. It is therefore a sort of average. If an index rose 2%, then it just means the average share price rose by 2%. The number of stocks included and the exact way the calculation is done, is different from one index to another. For example, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is composed of 30 stocks, the 30 biggest companies in the US. The S&P 500 contains (you guessed it) 500 stocks, weighted by their size, and is therefore more representative for the economy as a whole. Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI), on the other hand, is composed of 100 top companies stocks. KLCI is a market value weighted indice, where price is weighted relative to the number of shares, rather than their total value.

So how do one determine how a particular index should be valued? Let's take a closer look at KLCI for example. It is now trading at about around 1,300. So is it cheap or expensive? The answer, however, can be very subjective, depending on the data compiled by different investment analysts. In principal, one should look at the forward one-year projected corporate earnings (eg., 2008) for a start. Compare that against the projected fair value of the component stocks, and one will get the Projected Price relative to earnings per share (PE) Ratio. The sum of all the component stocks' PE ratio will become a major factor to the would-be value of the stock index. So if one analyst's view of the forward PE as encouraging, he or she may place KLCI at say 1400, as the fair value by the end of the year. Get the point?

However, there is a major twist here! The key complication here is everyone is entitled to a different opinion. Some may be bullish over a particular stock's future earnings, another may be bearish. So the end result can be dramatically different! For example, a particular analyst may be recommending a buy on our low cost budget carrier, Air Asia but another analyst may recommend a sell (which is true right now, depending on one's ability to buy into Air Asia's growth story versus the high gearing which can be a real risk in view of the company's aggressive plan to expand their planes!) So at the end, I would say, the final decision belongs to the investor's self judgment as to who to believe, based on his or her instinct and knowledge of the matter and economy!

Someone asked me this question....given KLCI was trading at around 1300 in 1993, surely Malaysia's index is considered expensive now given that it is now trading at close to that number. The answer lies in how well companies perform and their projected earnings. At the end of the day, fundamentals and future prospects hold the key to any market rises.

Back to the question, is KLCI index cheap or expensive? Let's look at this table:








(Source: CIMB Investment Bank Research)

At 1300, KLCI is trading at around 14x PE. So judge for yourself whether it is cheap or expensive. It is interesting to see that if we go by the 25-year average of 20x PE, KLCI should be trading at 1,880!!

5 comments:

bokjae said...

hi sonny good posts! My personal review on air asia is that it is risky! As for the current PE of 14X at an Index of 1300 when compared to the 25 yr avg PE of 20x it looks like it is indeed expensive!

Malaysia Mortgage Broker said...

Hi Cheong, thanks for visiting!

Actually the lower the PE the cheaper the valuation. Hope you got it right here.

Airline business is indeed a very risky business...typically capital intensive (having to buy or lease the airlines) and heavy financing. Though the business is risky, i am a strong advocaat of Tony Fernandez whom I think have done an unbelievable job within such a short time. He is truly some character, visionary and bold to challenge the big boys like Malaysia Airlines and have defy the odds so far. Truly a wonderful Malaysia success story and done the country proud! Living true to his words..."now everyone can fly"!

Anonymous said...

Hi, Informative post.

I think one of the main issues with subjectivist in markets is that the primary sources of knowledge (advisor's, media, government), tend to steer investors more toward opinion instead of self education. Keep up the Education!

JamyTan said...

Hmmm... many of my stocks that I bought way in 1993 had gone kaput, ie zero value.

How many Malaysian actually earn money from KLSE over the last 20years ? How many people actually retire comfortably through stocks ?

I personally think investing in emerging market like Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesian is too risky.

I wonder how long would it takes for emerging market funds to reach the quality of Berkshire Hathaway funds. Many couples who invested in this fund in the 50's are retiring very comfortably now.

In 1957, a young couple named Bill and Carol Angle who invested 1/2 of their savings on this funds are having US300millions on their retire nest.

I wonder any Malaysian funds would be able to give me such a return in 50years ? Hmm...

I look at KLSE more of a gambling table than investment. I lost all my money on the table in 1993-1995.

The best investment class for the next 10 years or so is Gold. It is a life time opportunity.

See my article on how I turned $567 into $1470 within 6 months , a wooping of 257% and this kind of opportunity still present itself continuously for another 10 years, I can comfortably say.

Check my gold investment blogs on :

http://www.seaykopitiam.com/category/gold-investment/

Jamy
www.seaykopitiam.com

Malaysia Mortgage Broker said...

Yes, the good old 1993 KLSE market bull run that was such a sweetener turned sour (in fact very sour!) thereafter. Back then, it was the very first bull market ever experienced by Malaysian investors (or rather traders or gambler?) and many of them did not know how to handle it! Then, stock prices were driven up so hot that any toss of coin would end up getting a jackpot! However, the roof came down hard thereafter as any sensible investors would know that over speculated and over valued (defy senses) stocks would come crashing down one day and did it happen!

It is safe to say that those who got burned heavily then were mainly retail investors who traded shares with the following "techniques":
- buy on rumours and speculation! (Tea lady was often the "best" source of information!)
- Don't need to know what the company does (their background, business, profitability, etc) because his/her friend or broker told him so.
- buy high, sell higher!
- buy on "Greed". Fast money is good!

Fact of the matter is, if one treats any stock market like a casino, the result will definitely become gambling nature. However, if one treats stock market as an investment and business, the result will often be quite different.

In my opinion, whether or not emerging markets are more risky is a matter of perception (depending on the regulatory framework, corporate governance, etc). However, it does not mean that there are no good companies in emerging markets. Surely there is a reason why global investment funds are pouring into Asia, and we can't ignore the fact that Asia is still offering the highest growth in the world today. (Sure there were some bad apples, but don't wipe out the forest!)

Risks are everywhere. Just look at US, where it supposed to be a mature market. The subprime mortgage issue in US is currently driving the whole world mad (& panic for some). The problem came about because of one word, Greed! People (including reputable investment bankers and hedge funds) wanted to make a quick buck on subprime loans and now they really live to regret it! I would like to stress that first of all, lending to non-credit worthy home buyers were unacceptable and suicidal, and surprise me most given the supposedly matured and well regulated financial markets in US!

At the end of the day, sticking to the age-old proven technique that is fundamental and value investing will seldom go wrong. In fact, it has been very rewarding for myself.

I do have some vested interest in Gold as well and i don't deny its potential. But for me, this is a defensive investment strategy.

At the end of day, one really needs to look at his or her own investment risk profile. For those who couldn't take the market volatility, it's best to stay away from the equity market and move to a more defensive investment instruments. In my opinion, there are money to be made everywhere, as long as one adopts the right approach and strategy.